Recent Comments
shawnsyms on Unfriendly Skies
GetReal on Unfriendly Skies
shawnsyms on Unfriendly Skies
GetReal on Unfriendly Skies
Read more on...
» Aboriginal rights (1)
» Activism (17)
» Advertising (1)
» Africa (2)
» Alternate Routes (4)
» American Politricks (10)
» American Presidential Election (9)
» Atheism (3)
» Book review (4)
» Bushfraud (10)
» Classic This (1)
» Contests (1)
» Copyright/left (7)
» Cultural industries (18)
» Development (1)
» Ear candy (14)
» Eco Chamber (4)
» Economics (5)
» Edumacation (1)
» Election 2008 (65)
» Environment (12)
» Events (5)
» Feminism (9)
» Film (24)
» Food Security and Agriculture (5)
» Friends of Canadian Broadcasting (3)
» From the intern desk (28)
» From the magazine (6)
» Fundi Watch (4)
» Gender (3)
» Generally Interesting (11)
» Global politics (12)
» Globalization (1)
» Happenings (6)
» Harm reduction (3)
» Harper Index (14)
» Healthcare (9)
» HIV/AIDS (7)
» Hot Docs festival (14)
» Human rights (23)
» Interweb (31)
» Labour (5)
» Labour days (5)
» Law (1)
» LGBT (17)
» Listen to This (2)
» Lit (9)
» Media navel-gazing (25)
» On the Hill (18)
» Pharma (3)
» Planet Earth (33)
» Polarized (16)
» Poverty (8)
» Prisons (2)
» Project Smog (2)
» Provincial Politricks (4)
» Queerly Canadian (11)
» Race (2)
» Religion (6)
» Resistance (9)
» Sexual Health (3)
» Signs of the Apocalypse (15)
» Sport (12)
» Television (1)
» Terrorism (not the state-sponsored kind) (10)
» THIS matters (35)
» ThisAbility (24)
» Time Wasters (6)
» Toronto (5)
» Vancouver (4)
» Video (1)
» Visual art (6)
» War and peace (18)
» Weekend Links (45)
Previous Entries
» Queerly Canadian #11: Have I become a professional lesbian?
» Eco chamber #4: Fighting for the Fry
» Jackpot! An interview with Filmmaker Alan Black
» Hot Docs launches with docs in crisis
» ThisAbility #25: Love Connection
» Film Club Contest!
» Eco Chamber #3 - Earth Day Special: A movement, not a day
» ThisAbility #24: Domesticity with a Disability
» In the age of Facebook, campaigns need to grow up already
» Eco Chamber #2: Countdown to Copenhagen
» Queerly Canadian #10: Teach them well, let them lead the way
» Eco Chamber #1: Past and future at the far end of the world
» ThisAbility #23: House Call
» Queerly Canadian #9: House-proud?
» ThisAbility #22 Are We There Yet?
» ThisAbility #21: Faking it
» 20 years on, the ocean still runs black
» My so called life without tv
» How to fix your favourite drink
» Intern with This: deadline is April 1!
Posted by shawnsyms at 11:51 AM ET
According to The Southern African (a Toronto-based diasporic news source), aviation workers in Botswana are in an uproar about new regulations requiring regular screening for HIVand the potential for dismissal of people who test positive.

The director of the nation's civil aviation authority, Olefile Moakofi, claimed "there are certain medical conditions that if people are diagnosed to have, then it may impair their judgement in the respective professions that they are rendering." No details were offered as how the presence of HIV would prevent a pilot or air-traffic controller from conducting his or her job. Young pilots are to be tested annually and older pilots more frequently. Authorities will also test blood pressure and for the presence of diabetes.
The international AIDS organization AVERT says that Botswana has the second highest rate of HIV prevalence in the worldbut the country has also been a leader among African nations in terms of the fight to get antiretroviral treatment into the hands of those who need it.
The International Labour Office, a UN agency, says that airlines once provided leadership on issues of HIV in the workplace, but that policies such as the one announced in Botswana are wrong: "Testing for HIV at the workplace [...] should be voluntary and confidential, and never used to screen job applicants or employees. Moetapele Motale of the Botswana Air Traffic Controllers Association said "There's suddenly a growing feeling of uneasiness amongst controllers and pilots." Indeed.
More entries on: Africa | HIV/AIDS
Previous: SPP Protest: Union Leader diffuses suspected provocateur
Next: Alternate Routes: Alternatives to Institutions
Maybe this whole AIDS plague could have been prevented if Air Canada had prevented one of their HIV-infected flight attendants from spreading HIV across the planet.
There is also a real health issue for pilots. The safety of the passengers is in their hands and they must be in top physical form. I don't think this is unreasonable.
Posted by: GetReal at August 22, 2007 12:44 AM
The first part of "GetReal"/Steve's comment is a misguided and wrong-headedly antagonistic non-sequitur. But if he genuinely wants to have an informed understanding of how HIV was first acquired by humans and how it spread, I highly recommend Stephanie Nolen's 28.
Over 40 million people have HIV and for the vast duration of that condition, it has no impact on their health that would affect their ability to carry out significant job responsibilities, including flying a plane.
Posted by: shawnsyms at August 22, 2007 02:40 PM
Shawn, you should know better. I make one anonymous comment, something I almost never do, and you try to out me. Would you have tried that if you agreed with what I wrote?
My basic point remains. HIV was initially spread by one flight attendant working for an airline. The 40 million people in the world with HIV have him to blame. You can't rewrite history, but if we have learned anything from this it is that public health is serious business. Erring on the side caution however ill founded should not be condemned.
Posted by: GetReal at August 22, 2007 09:19 PM
>>My basic point remains. HIV was initially spread by one flight attendant working for an airline. The 40 million people in the world with HIV have him to blame.
Actually, no. The semi-fictional Gaetan Dugas hypothesis that was propagated in Randy Shilts' And the Band Played On was later debunked by the scientist whose work Shilts misinterpreted.
People's travel patterns do have some impact on HIV transmission; this is documented. That has nothing to do with the fact that people with HIV don't put anyone at risk of danger whatsoever when they engage in the act of flying a plane. People with HIV don't just get some kind of random explosion of sickness while they are in the pilot's chair. It's like anyone else. If they don't feel well, they stay home from work. Even if they didn't, the risk would be the same (or lower) than with any other medical condition.
Posted by: shawnsyms at August 22, 2007 09:59 PM
Blog This Must-Reads
Blog This Archives
May 2009