THIS MAGAZINE: BECAUSE EVERTHING IS POLITICAL

Search for:

• FEATURES
• THIS & THAT
• ARTS & IDEAS
• FICTION & POETRY
• LETTERS
• BLOG THIS
•  
• SUBSCRIBE
• BACK ISSUES
• SUPPORT THIS
•  
• ABOUT THIS
• CONTRIBUTORS
• CONTACT THIS
• ADVERTISE
• SITE MAP

Home » Blog This

September 12, 2008

Facebook vote swapping: Clearly it's time for PR

Posted by Graham F. Scott at 12:11 PM ET

The sudden appearance of a Facebook group called "Anti-Harper Vote Swap Canada" has me torn. Frankly, I'm opposed to strategic voting: it distorts an already distorted-enough electoral process and mostly it doesn't work. Vote swapping is meant to allow people to vote strategically while still voting their consciences. You agree to hold your nose and mark the ballot for a candidate you don't truly support, with the agreement that someone else in another riding will do the same, with the common goal of influencing the larger party-level results. Let's leave aside for a moment that this works (or fails to work) entirely on the honour system, and that people may not actually follow through. What this movement really illustrates is the need to scrap our perverse First-Past-The-Post electoral system.

Vote swapping is just a symptom of a deeper problem: for most people in the country, it doesn't matter a whit who they vote for. At the riding level, their votes have no effect on their parliamentary representation, because MPs are routinely elected after receiving just a third of the votes cast. People are trying to find their own ways to game the system so that their votes actually have an impact, and vote-swapping is one of those ways. But it's not a real solution. What we need is a well-thought-through proportional voting system that produces a parliament that actually represents the opinion of the voters. There's a Faceboook group for that, too.

More entries on: Election 2008

Previous: September-October issue on newsstands now
Next: What is Stephen Harper Reading?

---

Reader comments:

Vote swapping,strategic voting bah humbug.
The only party that profits is the Liberal Party,mediocrity personified.
No the better strategy is to believe in something and vote for the party that best represents your view no matter what the odds are of that particular party forming the government .
Like fine wine it takes time to build a quality party,every vote counts,every vote builds the party.
One day down the road it will all come together.
But vote "strategically",or buy into the "anyone but Harper" argument well you get what you get,i.e mediocrity/Liberal Party.

Posted by: dirk at September 12, 2008 02:29 PM

•

---

Post your own comment:

Name:

Email Address:

URL:
Remember Me? YesNo

Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)

---

 Subscribe to the feed

---

Blog This Must-Reads

---

---

---

Blog This Archives

May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
March 2000

---