THIS MAGAZINE: BECAUSE EVERTHING IS POLITICAL

Search for:

• FEATURES
• THIS & THAT
• ARTS & IDEAS
• FICTION & POETRY
• LETTERS
• BLOG THIS
•  
• SUBSCRIBE
• BACK ISSUES
• SUPPORT THIS
•  
• ABOUT THIS
• CONTRIBUTORS
• CONTACT THIS
• ADVERTISE
• SITE MAP

Home » Blog This

September 16, 2008

The Price of Propaganda

Posted by Graeme McElheran at 02:41 PM ET

IN EDMONTON

Things political start to stink when they stagnate.

Conservatives have typically had a lock on fiscal prudence, portraying the other mainstream parties as tax-and-spendthrifts who cannot be trusted with the public purse. Canadians have long accepted the presumption that Conservatives would keep tighter control of public finance than any other party.

Those days are over, or should be, and I'm not just talking about Stephen Harper's most recent budget that has a war to pay for - call it what it is - on top of some things Canadians need, as well as a few they want.

It seems the Conservatives have been in power too long - in Alberta, at least. They've lost touch with their grassroots. The Reform movement that Harper and many of his cohorts were parts of - that gave rise to the current government - had a tightfisted ethos. One of its mainstays was for government to cut spending, and strict accountability for spending that could not be cut.

I wonder what Preston Manning would say about political advertisements for incumbent Conservative MPs being paid for not from Conservative party coffers, but with taxpayer funds.

The "non-partisan" Canadian Taxpayers Federation - traditionally a Liberal-bashing, Conservative-extolling lobby group with links to Manning, Reform and the Conservatives - clearly disapproves of taxpayers bearing the cost of campaign advertising. The CTF filed a formal complaint with Elections Canada over perceived Liberal indiscretions of this vein in Beaches-East York, saying a Liberal MP's pamphlet "amounts to election advertising and its cost should not be borne by the taxpayers of Canada."

In Alberta the CTF made similar comments - but alas, filed no grievance - when Conservative campaign propaganda circulated during the weeks just prior to and now following the election call.

The black-and-white format, featuring either Harper or the local candidate, is always the same, the message always similar: your neighbourhood is not safe; previous Liberal governments are to blame; Conservatives are taking Real Action!

Leaving aside the touchy issue of playing up public fear and outrage at a lax justice system in order to court votes, there seems to be an essential hypocrisy at work here. Surely the Conservative power base would not approve of MPs using taxpayer money from their expense accounts to publish election campaign material. Surely this is one of those areas where Conservatives are much more accountable than those Liberals scoundrels.

Well, maybe a bit. According to the CTF, Liberals are worse when it comes to using public funds for partisan political purposes (lest we forget the Gomery inquiry). But Conservatives are also spending public money this way - a departure from their fundamentals.

The parties that trade governance of Canada back and forth are both guilty of this practice. It has become the norm, and we're expected to buy the Conservative evasion that the Liberals spend public money this way too, only more of it and more often.

Canadians, I sense, are weary of the politics of could-be-worse. Unfortunately were stuck with such a deflated attitude because so far there's nothing really inspiring about this election, no new ideas, nothing dynamic to get behind. The Green Shift is a flop. Nothing and no one has galvanized voters or kindled their faith. Parties are sticking with tried and true strategy: 'Pick us over the other guys, because they'd be worse than us.'

So, you know, we'll pick one of them. But it seems a return to fundamentals is in order, for all parties. They should be offering Canadians something better than could-be-worse. Isn't that why we elected them in the first place?

More entries on: Election 2008

Previous: I've got 66 million reasons the U.S. electoral system is broken
Next: Pick A Number, Any Number

---

Reader comments:

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation has filed a complaint with Elections Canada that addresses ALL parties' such mailings.

The initial letter dealt with Liberal MP Maria Minna and stated ALL such cases be treated similarly. A second letter was sent to reiterate that ALL such cases be treated similarly.

It couldn't be clearer. Taxpayers should not bear the costs for political mailouts.

Kevin Gaudet
Ontario Director
Canadian Taxpayers Federation

Posted by: Kevin Gaudet at September 16, 2008 05:01 PM

•

I agree. The Alberta Tories are a disgrace. Elected by 22% of the electorate only, they still have the gall to call themselves a majority government.

They spend like drunken (Liberal) sailors. Both the Liberals and NDP in the province would be fiscally more conservative and prudent than the Tories.

Plus, the Tories have taken to social engineering of the worst kind -- totally un-Albertan.

Posted by: Werner Patels at September 20, 2008 11:02 PM

•

---

Post your own comment:

Name:

Email Address:

URL:
Remember Me? YesNo

Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)

---

 Subscribe to the feed

---

Blog This Must-Reads

---

---

---

Blog This Archives

May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
March 2000

---